However, I noticed that most clients weren’t happy with the results these agencies produced, and eventually, I realized it was because this process doesn’t produce results.
So instead, I’m building a content marketing agency that fixes those three problems. In this post, I’ll describe the three pillars of my content marketing strategy, my philosophies behind why I believe in these three pillars, and some results I’ve achieved using this strategy.
The first pillar of my strategy is to target high purchase intent keywords – even if it means the keyword has less than 20 monthly searches.
Why?
I’ve found that these keywords drive the overwhelming majority of conversions. Just look at the screenshot from one of my clients last month
Over 91% of the 56 total first touch conversions came from these bottom of the funnel posts, even though many of the keywords had tiny volume (less than 20 monthly searches).
I wish I could take credit for the strategy behind these results, but I actually learned it from the team at Grow and Convert.
Long story short, several years ago I had the co-founder of Grow and Convert, Benji Hyam, on my podcast and he explained the concept of pain point SEO. Essentially, they target low volume, high purchase intent keywords and report on conversions – not traffic.
A key reason most content doesn’t convert is that the writer and/or agency doesn’t know what key customer pain points the product solves and how it’s different from other products on the market.
So I interview the founder, customer success team, and sales team at the beginning of every engagement to identify those key pain points. (You can read more about how I execute customer research here.)
Then, I craft each piece of content to address those key pain points. This process is simple yet incredibly effective.
Think about it – if you’re actively searching for a solution to a specific problem and you read about a solution that solves your specific problem, isn’t it a no-brainer to buy?
I’ll give you an example.
Let’s say you have a marketing analytics tool and I discover during customer research that 90% of your customers purchase it because they want to track conversions from content.
So in the blog post, instead of just positioning your tool as another good marketing analytics tool, I’d talk about how you’re uniquely positioned as the best marketing analytics tool for content marketers.
If a content marketer is actively looking for a marketing analytics tool and they read that, it’s a no-brainer for them to convert because they see how you solve their specific pain point.
For example, if I sell project management software to startups I would probably select the second keyword even though it has much less volume
I used to balk at this idea, but when I saw the data, I changed my mind. This is a screenshot from a client’s conversions last month (most of these BOFU keywords had a search volume of less than 20 and the TOFU keywords were in the hundreds):
You could argue that those startups that found your post on methodologies will later come back and buy from you when they’re ready. However, they will probably just Google “project management software for startups” when they’re ready to buy, so if you don’t show up when they search for that term, you’ll probably lose them anyway.
So how do I find these keywords?
Pain point keywords can be a little trickier as there isn’t really a set formula, so you’ll really have to rely on customer research.
Specifically, look at what “how to” questions the product helps the user solve. You can also look at specific pain points a certain feature solves.
You’ll notice that in all of these posts, I include the product as part of the solution – this is key to driving conversions with that content.
Most writers are given a keyword, Google around to become an “expert” on that topic, and then create a new curation of the existing ideas.
To make the writers experts on the topic, a key thing that Grow and Convert does is interview experts (either from within the company or a third party expert).
While I don’t think every post requires an expert interview (like product-focused keywords), I still occasionally do expert interviews for some posts.
For example, I was writing a post for the keyword “email formula” for Sumo.com, and I decided to interview an expert that wrote an email that achieved a 78% open rate and thousands of dollars in sales. The post currently ranks first for “email formula”:
Finally, the copywriting needs to be compelling enough to drive the reader to actually purchase the product.
I already covered in the customer research point that the writing needs to address the customer pain points. So to ensure that the writers accurately describe key customer pain points and correctly position the product, I give them access to the call recordings.
Then, I also ask them to use this general structure when discussing product features:
If you want me to execute this three pillar strategy for you, reach out to me here and we can see if it’s a good fit. Or, if you’d rather execute this process yourself, you can sign up for my email list here and I’ll send you a mini course (one email over the course of eight days) with simple instructions to execute the process yourself.
I thought I was a genius when I figured out Pillar #1 (targeting high purchase intent keywords). However, as I started deploying the program on startups with low domain authorities, I realized that I couldn’t get the posts to rank (and if the posts don’t rank, the entire strategy from Pillar #1 is basically useless).
This makes sense. Data shows that higher domain authority (which is calculated based on backlinks) is correlated with higher rankings.
In my own experience, I’ve found this to be true.
I can usually get content to rank in a matter of weeks (sometimes even days) on websites that have strong domain authority and an established presence in their industry.
For example, this post was published just 12 days ago on a DR 71 website and it is already ranking fourth for the target keyword:
However, I also worked with a startup that has a domain rating of 20. Before coming to me, they didn’t publish any content, and when I started publishing content on their website (using the exact same process), it didn’t rank for months.
This bothered me because it meant that my strategy is completely useless for websites with a DR/DA of less than 50.
I know that a lot of people invest in manual link building, but I have a few problems with it.
First, it’s not very scalable. You only earn a link when someone responds to your email pitch and agrees. So if you have a 2% acceptance rate, you’re sending at least 50 emails to get one yes. That’s a lot of emails and could get your domain banned (long story, but I’ve been there).
Secondly, it’s super expensive. Ahrefs did a study back in 2018 that found the average price of a link is just over $360! If you want to get a link from a DA 50+ website, the average price is just over $600!
In addition, the links you build can be removed at any time (in fact, they probably will be removed in about five or more years if your content isn’t updated).
Finally, buying links is against Google’s Webmaster Guidelines. While plenty of people still do it quite successfully, there’s always a risk.
So for all of those reasons, I’ve never really liked the idea of manual link building.
However, it still remains true that links significantly impact domain authority, and therefore rankings.
So I wanted to figure out a way to passively increase the overall domain authority of a website.
Fortunately, I found a solution – original research.
Original research and data attracts a lot of links simply because plenty of content marketers are always Googling around to find data to support their claims.
For the first post, I just used Ahrefs and some existing internal data to find answers to some questions I asked myself internally.
For the second post, I collected the data using various third party tools.
The beauty of these posts is that they generated more, high quality backlinks than anything I could have built manually. Check out the link profile of the content update study:
It has a total of twelve 50+ DR links, so using the average price per link according to the Ahrefs study ($600 for DR 50+ links) we would have had to pay $7,200 to manually acquire the links this post acquired passively.
The problem is that I had to really know the industry well to come up with a clever data study, and it generally wasn’t that scalable.
However, I recently discovered Pollfish, which enables you to run surveys to very specific audiences (i.e., coaches that make $50,000+ per year, CFOs at companies of 200+ people, etc.) and the results have been pretty good.
So now, I offer quarterly research-based posts to all my clients as I feel that this is a scalable strategy that enables them to consistently earn high quality, passive links.
To maximize the linkability of the post, I swipe Brian Dean’s method of targeting journalistic keywords/phrases. For example, “how many clients do life coaches have” is a frequently asked question.
So I might add that question to the survey and then optimize the post to rank for that keyword. This way, journalists searching for statistics can find my post and link to it.
Do you want me to execute this three pillar strategy for your company? Feel free to reach out here and we can see if it’s a good fit.
If you want me to execute this three pillar strategy for you, reach out to me here and we can see if it’s a good fit. Or, if you’d rather execute this process yourself, you can sign up for my email list here and I’ll send you a mini course (one email over the course of eight days) with simple instructions to execute the process yourself.
The final pillar of my content offering is refreshing content – taking content that previously performed well and updating it to boost its rankings once more.
Content does decay over time, so all the work you did three years ago probably generates only a fraction of the value it used to. Content refreshing fixes that problem.
In fact, here’s a screenshot of a single post that I updated at the end of 2019 that went on to generate over 20,000 visitors at peak performance:
Though before I paint a rosy picture about how wonderful content refreshing is, I also want to acknowledge that not every single piece of content performs well after being updated.
In fact, I noticed that a lot of the content didn’t generate even one more monthly visit after being updated.
I wanted to understand why some updated content improved significantly while others didn’t improve at all, so I did a study of 42 different blog posts that I helped update for an agency called Single Grain.
I found that overall, the total traffic to those 42 posts nearly doubled, even though 17 of the blog posts actually decreased in traffic after the update.
So even though some content didn’t perform well after the update (17 of the 42 posts lost traffic), it’s still very worthwhile to invest in content updating because the results from the posts that do takeoff far outweigh the investment of the posts that failed.
Though back to my original question – why does some content perform very well after being updated while other posts flop after an update?
It turns out that the biggest indicator of how a post will perform after being updated is the traction it has before being refreshed.
In the study, about half the posts had at least 20 monthly visits before being updated, and the other half had less than 20 monthly visits before being updated.
I found that 85.2% of the total traffic increase came from the roughly 50% of posts that already had over 20 monthly visits.
So it makes sense to prioritize updating posts that already have strong traction.
However, I also still believe in the power of high-purchase intent keywords (refer back to Pillar #1).
So today, I update content that has the best combination of these two elements (the post targets a high purchase intent keyword and already has decent traction).
Once I’ve selected the post I want to update, I have a set process for updating each piece of content which I outline in this post on Ahrefs.
If you’d rather have me do content marketing for you, feel free to reach out and we can see if it’s a good fit.
Otherwise, you can sign up for my email list and I’ll give you detailed, step-by-step instructions to help you execute the entire content marketing process outlined here yourself.
Reach out to me and we can see if it's a good fit.
If you’d like to work with my team and I, please fill out the form and we’ll be in touch shortly!
Sign up for my email list and I’ll send you a mini-course (1 email over the next 8 days) that helps you execute this strategy step by step.
